The Couch
thought crimes
Title thought crimes
Message i was recently asked, as part of a thought experiment, if i felt it should be illegal to view child pornography, even if one did not participate in the making of it. my answer was that yes, it should still be illegal, because by becoming audience to it, one is supporting the sexual exploitation of children (obviously the anticipated response). the next question, then, was whether child pornography should be illegal even if no children were exploited in the making of it - for example, if it were part of a virtual reality setting wherein the pornographic scenes were created with CGI instead of live people. the same question could equally apply to a rape scenario, or any other action which, if it were happening for real, would be a crime. in your opinion, should it be illegal to produce material which enables people to participate in "virtual" criminal activities - what one might call "thought crimes"? bear in mind that people are already able to kill other people in all sorts of explicitly violent ways in video games. should CGI child pornography be permitted? i find it a particularly sensitive issue; i am against the idea of it myself. i am also against the viewing of snuff films. i'd love to hear your thoughts. cheers, lib
Ownership libertygrl
Views 5016 views. Averaging 1 view per day.
Submission Date 08/24/08 - 2:22 AM

Previous Topic | Next Topic



Acknowledgements:

Couch logo design by Midnight_Monk. The photo hanging above the couch was taken by Paul.

Powered by WSN Forum. Free smileys here.
Special thanks to Maria Cristina, Jesse , Echolist Directory, The Star Online,
Hosting Free Webs, and dmoz.org for referring visitors to this site!

Copyright notice:

Except where noted otherwise, copyright belongs to respective authors
for artwork, photography and text posted in this forum.